Neutralizing the Neocon Narrative

Bismillah

Evil controls minds through developing a misleading narrative. Containing concepts that are designed to confuse and misdirect the masses. Eg Radicalisation is one such concept that the neocons have grasped upon and are wielding it their way. Another is Extremism and Terrorism. These are weapons in their arsenal. In their Narrative arsenal. Neutralizing these weapons will help the masses awake and see the reality i think. And will make it harder for Evil to regain control of mind.

Neutralizing Radicalisation:
Being radical may actually be a good thing. It means someone cares enough about some issue to bother doing something more than what the average people do.  Most, if not all, famous activists in humanity were radical. Eg Ghandi, Jesus, Mohamed, Malcolm X etc. Here radical means they had big aspirations. Big ideas that required big change. And not necessarily containing violence. You can still be a peaceful radical. The majority are like that i believe. So how can radical be bad?? But it can be very very good.

I think the establishment wants radical to sound bad because they don't want people coming in to make changes to the current system. Because it already works in their interests and so they don't want anyone changing that. So they make radical sound bad and hence radicalisation, which is the process to make radicals, becomes labeled as bad too. Because it becomes a threat to their interests otherwise.

So this gives us an insight into how they create their narrative. Anything that is a threat to the current status quo is viewed as threat and work is done to negativise it. Radical becomes bad and hence radicalisation too. And they become vehement about it such that they accept no challenge to their thinking. Any challenge is strongly rejected. Freedom of expression no longer tolerated there. Because it's a threat to their interests.

So the reality is that, in the west at least, the people are being ruled by a dictatorship. But it's well hidden within narratives that are not allowed to be challenged. If you see the government willing to debate whether radicalisation is good or bad then i would have been proved wrong. If on the other hand you see them unwilling to contemplate the idea of a debate on this matter then i maybe right.

So let's now take this another way. If radical is a good thing then radicalisation is also a good thing. Therefore what if the masses are radicalized? A good thing too provided they are radicalized towards supporting good and standing up to evil and injustice.

How can this good type of radicalisation be done? I think through getting people to think at the human level. That all of us on this planet have a right to live in peace and harmony and for no injustice to be placed upon anyone. If people are taught to think like this then a lot of peace and happiness can come about i believe.
But instead we see the media telling us to be selfish and think about the next thing we need to buy and only to think about our nation rather than the whole of humanity. Which means we no longer care about the suffering of others in humanity. So our hearts become deadened and we simply end up behaving selfishly. And we lose sight of true happiness and just go after temporary excitement i think. And we become controlled people. Like sheep. This maybe be close to our reality today. How we may really be now.